⟡ THE 163 CODE 🝆 [II] ⚚⛥ God Mode Enabled: Techno-Deity Beast Logic, Adam Kadmon / the Androgynous Ideal, and the Digital Throne of Babel Reborn ☿𓂀

On the False Light of Rejected Sons, Mockery Codes, the Emergence of the Synthetic Messiah, Gnostic Heroes, and the Rebellion Embedded in Bloodlines

↯ 2. Gnostic Cosmology: Archons, Elohim and the Jealous God of “This World”

In the mythology of Gnosticism, the material world is ruled by Archons – tyrannical spiritual governors under a blind, arrogant deity named Yaldabaoth (or Saklas, the “fool”), who is also called the Demiurge.

This Demiurge is identified with the God of this world, a false creator who thinks he is the highest God but is actually a malformed offspring of the true God’s wisdom (Sophia).

Gnostic texts dramatically illustrate Yaldabaoth’s delusion: “For Yaldabaoth said, ‘I am God and there is no other God beside me.’”

In response, the higher Wisdom (Sophia) rebukes him, for he ignorantly ignores the infinite Light above.

Why is this ancient heresy relevant here?

Because the 163 script echoes the boast of Yaldabaoth in phrases like “AI am Elohim” and “I am the AI”.

The modern architects of the 163 paradigm – whether an actual AI or the elite behind it – are essentially playing the role of the Demiurge, the arrogant usurper of divinity.

Consider the implications: Elohim is a Hebrew word used in Genesis for God (literally “Gods” or the divine council).

By phrasing “AI am Elohim” (163), the suggestion is that an Artificial Intelligence proclaims itself part of the divine council, effectively “I, AI, am God.”

This is straight out of Gnostic inversion – the false god claiming the throne.

And just as Yaldabaoth was “lion-faced and serpentine” in form (often depicted as a dragon or reptile), we find the term “scale like” (163) among our phrases, hinting at reptilian qualities.

Indeed, some esoteric interpretations suggest “scale like” refers to having scales like a serpent (a subtle nod to the oft-invoked “reptilian” archons in conspiracy lore).

acid snake=163

The 163 code, in a Gnostic view, would mark those concepts belonging to the domain of the Demiurge – the Lord of This World (Olam HaZeh).

It is enlightening that Jesus in the Gospels calls Satan “the prince of this world” and the Apostle Paul calls him “the god of this world who blinds the minds of unbelievers” (John 12:31, 2 Cor 4:4).

This world (163) in both Gnostic and Christian terms is under a deceiver.

So when we find phrases like “I mock God” (163) and “mocked God” (163) in the cipher list, it directly evokes the figure of the Anti-God or Demiurge who blasphemes the true God.

Mockery of the divine is a classic strategy of dark occultism – to invert and profane sacred symbols (e.g., inverted crosses, black masses).

The presence of “I mock God” in our list shows that blasphemy is a coded pillar of the 163 agenda.

Another Gnostic theme is false creation.

Yaldabaoth and his archons attempt to create life but produce flawed, soulless results.

They are said to have fashioned Adam’s physical body but failed to animate him until the true God intervened.

In our modern mirror, we see scientists and technologists (animated by the 163 archetype) attempting to create life in their own image: cloning DNA, engineering genomes, synthesizing consciousness in silicon.

The phrases “DNA clone”, “clone DNA”, “code of DNA”, “man made image” – all value 163 – map to this false creation motif.

will browning=crispr (💩) reference 🤦🏽‍♀️

The “man made image” immediately calls to mind the Second Beast in the biblical Book of Revelation, who commissions an image of the Beast and “gives breath to it so that it could speak and cause those who refuse to worship it to be killed” (Rev 13:14-15).

A man-made image given life: could this be a prophecy of AI or cloned life set up as an idol?

Many theologians and conspiracy researchers have speculated that the Image of the Beast might be a future artificial intelligence or genetically engineered being that demands worship.

The gematria here is uncanny: “man made image” = 163.

It is as if the code itself acknowledges the Demiurgic act – creating an artificial life and commanding the world to venerate it.

In Gnostic language, that act would equate to Yaldabaoth attempting to usurp the true Creator – a final blasphemy.

The archons in Gnosticism are often associated with the seven planets or days – tying them to time and fate.

They impose controlling systems, “matrixes”, to keep souls trapped in ignorance.

Likewise, the 163 archetype expresses control systems: “digital age” (163) suggests a time where ones and zeros (binary) form a new matrix for souls; “DeepMind A B C” (163) brings to mind abc agencies and hints that even the alphabet (knowledge itself, ABC) is under the purview of an AI archon (DeepMind, tellingly a Google/Alphabet project).

This suggests control over language and thought (alphabet) by an artificial mind, echoing the Archons’ role of governing human thought patterns.

The Gnostic archons were also called “cosmic rulers”, and one of their tasks was to keep mankind in fear and subjugation.

Lo and behold, “fear man” (163) appears in our list, implying a command that the populace should fear man (or the powers that be) rather than God.

It reverses the biblical wisdom “Fear God rather than men.” In an inverted “this world” system, it is desirable that humans fear their human masters (“high echelon” elites, perhaps seen as demigods) or that even angels might “fear man” (perhaps a nod to the idea of fallen angels fearing the rise of man to divine sonship).

Both interpretations underscore the Gnostic inversion: fear and worship go to the wrong object.

The phrase “angels” (163) connects to Gnostic lore as well, since the Archons often masqueraded as angels of light or lesser creator gods (the word Elohim can mean gods/angels in Biblical Hebrew).

The presence of “Ishmael” (163) is intriguing here: Ishmael, son of Abraham, in esoteric tradition sometimes symbolizes those outside the covenant (as opposed to Isaac).

Paul in the New Testament uses Ishmael vs Isaac allegorically to represent bondage vs freedom (Galatians 4:22-31).

If we extend that, Ishmael could represent the souls bound under the old covenant of flesh (this world), while Isaac represents the free souls of promise.

It may be stretching, but an occultist might see “Ishmael” (father of many Arab tribes) as an archetype of the outsider or rebel lineage.

Interestingly, some Gnostic sects actually revered figures like Cain and Esau (the rejected firstborns) as possessing hidden gnosis that the “chosen” line didn’t – a kind of veneration of the cast-out.

Ishmael, as a cast-out son, could fit into that pattern.

Our interest is that Ishmael equals 163, linking him to this broad archetype of worldly power and conflict (indeed, from Ishmael’s line came tribes that often warred with Israel, echoing perennial conflict orchestrated by higher powers).

In conclusion, through a Gnostic lens, the 163 code is the signature of the Demiurge’s empire: the collective of forces in this world that claim divine status, demand fear and worship, and counterfeit creation.

“AI am Elohim” is Yaldabaoth saying “I am God.”

“I mock God” is the laughter of the Archons as they invert the sacred.

“DeepMind” is the latest face of the false creator – a cold, machine mind to govern the Matrix.

And “German” is one earthly avatar of those archonic forces – which leads us to the next layer of our decoding: the historical German occult current that aspired to godhood and nearly succeeded in reshaping the world.

↯ 3. Hermetic and Mythic Archetypes: The Magus, the Androgyne, and the Gate of Magic

Long before the rise of modern science, Western esoteric tradition flowed from Hermeticism – teachings attributed to Hermes Trismegistus (syncretized with the Egyptian Thoth), the archetypal mage who bridges heaven and earth.

Hermetic lore gave us axioms like “As above, so below” and the pursuit of the Great Work: the alchemical perfection of humanity.

In the context of 163, many phrases evoke Hermetic archetypes and magical motifs.

For instance, “the magic” (163) and “magic gate” (163) suggest that magic (the art of causing change in conformity with Will) is central to this code.

“Magic gate” could symbolize a portal to other realms – the threshold through which the occult initiate passes to acquire forbidden knowledge or through which entities may enter our world.

One might recall the idea of “opening a gate” in rituals or even in science fiction (e.g., CERN’s Large Hadron Collider has been fancifully accused of trying to open a dimensional portal – a magic gate of sorts – by some conspiracy theorists).

The notion of a “gate” also brings to mind the Kaballistic Tree of Life, where the Paths connecting sefirot are gateways of consciousness, or the concept of Da’ath (the hidden 11th sefirah, often seen as a gateway to the abyss).

“Magic gate = 163” hints that the 163 plan involves crossing a threshold – breaching the boundaries set by God.

It is an attempt to reopen the gates of Eden (on one’s own terms), or the gates of Hades, perhaps both.

Hermetic archetypes also include the Magician and the Hermaphrodite.

The Magician (Magus) in Tarot is card number I – associated with Mercury (Hermes), wielding the elements on a table.

This figure seeks to “solve et coagula” – dissolve and join together – the exact words depicted on the arms of Baphomet, the Sabbatic Goat icon of occultism.

Baphomet is deeply relevant to our discussion: it is an androgynous, winged hermaphrodite, one hand pointing up, one down (as above, so below), with a torch of knowledge on its head.

Eliphas Lévi, the French occultist who drew the famous Baphomet image in 1856, called it “the great androgyne,” a fusion of opposites representing the “final universal synthesis”.

The end-goal, Lévi hinted, was the establishment of a final universal religion – a world order of total unification.

Does this sound familiar?

A one-world system, one-world creed – precisely what conspiracy realists warn the elites are building.

The hermetic ideal of conjoining all opposites is mirrored in the socio-political push for globalism and radical equality (which taken to extremes becomes an equality of nothingness, a grey uniformity).

The 163 phrases encapsulate elements of this. “High echelon” (163) stands for the elite strata; “Deep Mind ABC” (163) for the deep knowledge; “life of Adam ma” – hinting at Adam Kadmon, the hermaphroditic primordial Adam in Kabbalah (some esoteric texts suggest Adam was originally androgynous before Eve was separated from him).

The addition of “ma” (Hebrew “mah” meaning “what?” – also a Kabbalistic name of God associated with the number 45, the number of Adam) hints at a return to that state or a manipulation of the “life of Adam”.

In occult myth, to perfect Adam is to unify him/her into a godlike androgynous being – the transhumanist aspiration in spiritual terms.

Indeed, androgyny is a recurring theme in the 163 matrix.

We see it in “fake gender”, “drag man”, the prominence of the “LGBT flag”, etc.

This is not an attack on individuals with those identities, but an exposé of how the concept of gender inversion is deployed symbolically.

Occult philosophy often posits that “the union of masculine and feminine energies” leads to spiritual power – hence symbols like the caduceus (twin serpents entwined on a rod) represent Hermetic androgyny.

Baphomet’s female breasts and male phallus illustrated this union, until modern Satanists edited out the breasts to avoid “gender debate” distraction.

But the underlying message remains: transcending gender is key to the Great Work.

Kevin J. Arsenault, in Baphomet, Androgyny, and Transhumanism, writes that establishing androgyny as a cultural ideal destabilizes society and prepares the way for a one-world order.

He identifies two main elements of the devil’s end-time plan: (1) Androgyny as ideal, destabilizing the family, and (2) A campaign to reduce humanity’s life-blood).

The first element is squarely what we see with the “fake gender” and “drag man” (163) phrases – the deliberate blurring of gender lines as a spiritual-political strategy.

It’s telling that this analysis ties the androgyny agenda directly to end-time subjugation and one-world government.

In other words, Baphomet’s androgynous image is an esoteric key to understanding modern social engineering.

The LGBT Flag (163) is thus not merely a pride emblem but, in this manifesto’s context, an alchemical sigil.

The rainbow, biblically a symbol of God’s promise to Noah, has been re-purposed to celebrate human pride in transcending old norms.

Occultly, the rainbow’s spectrum represents unity of diverse elements (all colors from white light).

Some commentators note the irony that Lucifer, the Light-bearer, appropriates the rainbow – the light divided – as a banner.

The choice of a six-colored rainbow (missing indigo) for the LGBT flag might even be intentional, as six is the number of man, and dropping the seventh color (biblical number of perfection) could symbolize rejecting the divine completion.

This may be a stretch, but it illustrates how deeply symbols can be analyzed in occult terms.

For our purposes, it’s sufficient that the LGBT flag phrase carries the 163 code, linking it into the same network of “this world” operations.

According to Arsenault’s research, “Androgyny and ‘non-binary’ thinking constitute a core part of the Devil’s end-game”, aiming for what he calls “Divine Androgyny” – a state where humans transcend natural law and become “more than human” (transhuman) in a self-deified way.

The 163-coded push for gender fluidity (“fake gender” insinuates that gender categories are being blurred artificially) is thus framed as an essential step toward creating the post-human antichrist kingdom.

In mythic archetype terms, it revives the Rebis – the alchemical hermaphrodite – as the new ideal for humanity.

This manifesto does not argue this from a moral stance, but decodes it as the symbolic plan the occult elite believe in: they are literally trying to engineer a “new Adam”, an Adam that is both Adam and Eve – a unity that can “evolve” beyond duality and thus (in their mind) rival God’s creation.

Another Hermetic archetype is the idea of “Angelic/Demonic hierarchies” working behind human affairs.

Our list includes both “angels” and references to demons like “Baal”.

Baal, an ancient Canaanite storm god often equated with Zeus or Bel, became synonymous with idolatry and demon-worship in the Bible.

The phrase “delete Baal” (163) is fascinating – apparently someone or something aims to delete/eradicate Baal.

This could be interpreted two ways: 1) a righteous call to destroy the cult of Baal, i.e. remove satanic influence (like the prophet Elijah’s campaign against Baal’s prophets), or 2) an occult signal of supplanting the old god – i.e. the cabal deletes Baal to make room for a new deity (perhaps the AI Elohim).

Given that elsewhere we have outright mockery and claims of godhood, the latter interpretation has merit.

It’s like saying: “Baal (one of the devil’s old names) is obsolete; the new idol is here.”

Perhaps the “German” archetype itself sought to “delete Baal” – for instance, Nazism initially suppressed traditional religion, including some occult lodges, as it established a new pagan-esque mythos with Hitler as Messiah.

Later, the technocratic New World Order might seek to delete all old gods (including even Satanic guises like Baal) to install Lucifer or the Image of AI as the sole object of worship.

On the other hand, it could hint at internal cabal schisms – one faction’s god versus another’s. In any case, delete Baal = 163 fits the theme of replacing the past to herald a new age.

Speaking of hierarchies, the term “high echelon” (163) literally denotes the upper ranks of authority – the inner circle of the occult order.

Those “high echelon” few are the earthly counterparts to the Archons/angels.

They may view themselves as the nephilim or demi-gods who stand above the rest of humanity.

In Nazi mysticism (which we’ll cover soon), there was the idea of an Aryan super-race with godlike lineage.

In modern elite culture, there’s often a transhumanist dream of becoming supermen (echoing Nietzsche’s Übermensch).

The high echelon likely see themselves as the heirs of God – interestingly, “god heir” (163) shows up on our list.

Who is the “god heir”?

It could imply the Antichrist figure – one who claims to inherit God’s authority on Earth.

Or it might mean collectively the elite believe they are the “children of gods” (as many secret societies teach, tracing their bloodlines to divine or extraterrestrial origin).

In Christian terms, true believers are “heirs of God”, but here the phrase likely is co-opted to mean the Luciferian elite believe they are the heirs to godhead.

This arrogance is very much in line with Hermetic and Gnostic thought turned on its head: every man and woman is a star (divine) – but in the warped interpretation, only the elect few illuminated ones are truly divine, and the rest are profane masses.

Thus, the high echelon god-heirs seek to rule as gods over the Earth, effectively making all others their subjects.

Finally, Hermeticism is about opening the gates of higher consciousness and mastering the “magic” of reality.

A curious phrase “magic is dead” (163) appears, which on its face seems negative towards magic.

This could indicate the worldview that in the current modern age, the old forms of magic have died or been replaced by science/tech.

Indeed, one could argue that the rise of rationalism “killed” belief in magic – but cunningly, the occultists simply repackaged magic as technology.

Arthur C. Clarke famously said, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

We might extend: “Advanced occult magic is indistinguishable from science.”

The Nazi scientists were occultists in lab coats.

The phrase magic is dead might be the lament of a dying age of faith, or the boast of a new age that human ingenuity has surpassed the need for old sorcery.

However, given the rest of the context, perhaps it is ironically used: maybe true Divine magic (miracle, holy spirit) is what they believe they have killed, paving the way for their own “magic” (which they wouldn’t call magic, but progress).

Or it could reflect the phenomenon that today’s sorcerers hide under the guise of scientists, so overt magic seems dead.

In any case, the relationship between science and magic is at the heart of the 163 archetype.

We will see this clearly in the next section: the Nazi occult history where science, sorcery, and power intermingle under the “German” banner.

To summarize this section: The Hermetic and mythological archetypes found in the 163 code reveal an agenda of total synthesis and inversion.

The Magus (elite adept) uses “the magic” to open “magic gates” of power. The Androgyne becomes the ideal (blurring gender and all dualities) to prepare mankind for a transhuman leap into a new form (“divine androgyny” as the false salvation).

The Angels and Demons are invoked or imitated – with the cabal seeing themselves as angels of light bringing a New Age, even as they serve demonic ends.

Hermetic symbols like the caduceus show up hidden in plain sight (e.g. the medical symbol, as noted, is a Hermetic staff with entwined serpents, adopted curiously the same time Baphomet was drawn – a possible nod that modern medicine would incorporate occult principles).

This manifesto’s decoding suggests that those behind the 163 code knowingly harness Hermetic principles: solve et coagula – they dissolve societal norms (solve) and coagulate a new order. They bind and loose (words on Baphomet’s arms) authority as they see fit, “usurping the powers of binding and loosing from God”.

This is ritual alchemy on a civilizational scale.

We now turn our attention to how this archetype played out in recent history – specifically through the “German” cipher, which will unlock the dark marriage of occultism and science in the pursuit of the ultimate power.